So, here is where we are with hubby and I'm going to put and paste the email conversation with the surgeon and then ask my question.
just spoke with Teresa in your office and she explained about our insurance not covering the sleeve for Chris and she told me that you had said we could just submit as RNY if we wanted to do it that way. I have one question. I know that the two stage operation, per our consult with you, was a third case scenario. We had discussed that you would prefer to just do the lap RNY and if you had any problems then it would move to the open RNY. At that point if there were still problems it would be the sleeve and then 100 pounds later, you would do a second surgery to do the bypass. So, if we just submit it as RNY, which would be approved, does that put Chris at any higher risk? I guess I don't quite understand what would change as far as doing the RNY -vs- the sleeve. Are you still concerned that you may not be able to do a lap RNY if that is what he is approved for?
Am I making any sense? I just am not quite following why if we can do an RNY in one surgery, why we submitted for two surgeries instead. I'm not upset that it was done that way (though we don't have the benefit as the insurance considers the sleeve "experimental") but I guess I just don't understand the benefit or need of one over the other. As long as Chris is not placed at any greater risk, we have no problem with just doing it in one shot, but I need your thoughts on this.
And his response to me, which you all might have already known the answer, was:
Hi
because his bmi=66 he is at high risk for complication and also conversion to open. He is also at high risk for an open operation that includes a very high risk of wound infection, large open wound and hernia.
we will go ahead as stated below and file for laparoscopic possible open RNY Gastric bypass
So, with that being the case, were any of you anywhere near a 66 BMI, what kind of surgery did you have and what were your complications, if any?